Jesus said: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up….he was speaking of the temple of his body” (Jn 2:19-21 NRSV).

One of the criticisms Premillennialists make against Amillennialists is that they spiritualise the prophecies concerning Israel in the last days.  They say that the prophecies in the Old Testament concerning Jesus’ coming to earth as a true man were fulfilled literally; therefore, they say, the prophecies of his return should also be taken literally.  But what they fail to mention is that the apostles spiritualised many end-times prophecies, showing how the Church fulfils them.

They also vainly say that Premillennialism was the universal belief of the early Church but the doctrine started being attacked by Origen, and then finished off comprehensively by Augustine.  But what they again fail to mention is that the eschatology of the early Church, and which is known as Chiliasm and Millenarianism, was not the doctrine of modern day Dispensational Premillennialism.

Despite the claims of Premillennialists, the doctrine of a premillennial return of Christ was not held universally, nor regarded as orthodox doctrine by all in the early centuries of the Christian church.  The Church historian Eusebius wrote about the views of an early Christian named Papias (70-155 AD).  Papias wrote of himself that he received the truths of Christianity from those who were acquainted with the apostles.  Eusebius (263-339) was one of those who did not hold a premillennial view; he says of Papias that “he set down other things as coming to him from unwritten tradition, amongst these some strange parables and instructions of the Saviour, and some other things of a more fabulous nature.  Amongst these he says that there will be a millennium after the resurrection from the dead, when the personal reign of Christ will be established on this earth (“Ante-Nicene Fathers” vol 1, “Fragments of Papias” p 154, Hendrickson Publ). 

And Justin Martyr (100-165 CE), in his dialogue with a Jew named Trypho, admitted that while he himself held to a millenarian view, not every Christian did.  To Trypho, Justin replied, “I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise’” (“Ante-Nicene Fathers” vol 1, “Dialogue with Trypho”, Justin Martyr, p 239, Hendrickson Pub.).

But the form of Millennialism held in the early Church was somewhat different to contemporary Dispensational Premillennialism.  The Israel of Chiliasm was a spiritual Israel i.e. all who confessed Christ as Saviour, regardless of ethnic or national origin.  The Israel of Chiliasm was the Church that Jesus was building (Matt 16:18; Eph 2:13-22 cf 3:10, 21). 

And the Chiliasts believed in a spiritual Israel in the last days because that’s what the apostles taught.  And that we’re living in the last days, which are from the ascension of Christ until his return, is stated clearly by the writer of Hebrews: “Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son…” (Heb 1:1).  This prophecy alone intimates that the prophecies are to be spiritualised. 

If the OT prophecies are taken literally, they lead to blasphemy because they become “another gospel”, and the Apostle Paul cursed all those who propagated and believed it (Gal 1:6-10).  For example, how can the prophecy in Ezekiel chapters 40-48 be taken literally when it abrogates the finished work on the cross and sends the Jews right back to the law which Christ, by his death on the cross, abolished? 

How can the OT prophecies, which are shown to be fulfilled in Hebrews, be taken literally when Hebrews shows that Christ is a better priest (Heb 2:14-18; 7:17-8:6) and a better sacrifice (Heb 10:1-18).  And the Old Covenant which is stated to be temporary and insufficient (Heb 8:7-13) is to be restored when Jesus comes to earth to set up a Jewish empire, with him ruling from Jerusalem while his subjects languish under the law (Acts 15:10)?

How can the OT sacrifices be restored in full, with a Levitical priesthood, when God, in Hebrews, said he hates them (Heb 10: 6, 8) and that they can never take away sin (Heb 10:3-4)?  How can all that Jesus accomplished on the cross to put away sin forever by his once-for-all sacrifice of himself on behalf of his people so that they can then have the law inflicted on them?  And all this for a thousand years?!!  This is insanity; or worse – blasphemy.   No wonder Paul rails against the whole idea of this Premillennialist gospel, and curses all who hold to it: “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you in the grace of Christ to a different gospel – not that there is another gospel, but there are some who are confusing you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.  But even if we or an angel from heaven should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to what we proclaimed to you, let that one be accursed” (Gal 1:6-9).

The apostle Paul: Galatians 4:19-31 – The free woman and the slave

In this passage, Paul compares the Old and the New Covenants by comparing the two sons of Abraham and the two women who bore them.  One son, Ishmael, was born of Hagar, a slave; the other son, Isaac, was born of Sarah, a free woman.  He says “For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and the other by a free woman.  One, the child of the slave, was born according to the flesh; the other, the child of the free woman, was born through the promise. Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants.  One woman, in fact, is Hagar, from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery.  Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.  But the other woman corresponds to the Jerusalem above; she is free, and she is our mother” (Gal 4:22-26).

Here we’re shown how the Old Covenant is inferior to the New and that it is, in fact, bondage.  But Christians, both Jew and Gentile believers in Christ, are free because they are of the Jerusalem which is from above.  This New Covenant is that which brings freedom and is in force for the rest of time.  Significantly, Paul writes “But what does the Scripture say?  ‘Drive out the slave and her child; for the child of the slave will not share the inheritance with the child of the free woman’” (Gal 4:30).  And in Romans 7:6 he writes But now we are discharged from the law, dead to that which held us captive, sothat we are slaves not under the old written code but in the new life of the Spirit”.  Then in Romans 9:8 he writes …it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as descendants”.

Romans 2:28-29 – True Jews and true circumcision

Further, he tells us what a true Jew is.  He says For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is true circumcision something external and physical.  Rather, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart – it is spiritual and not literal” (Rom 2:28-29).

Therefore, if a true Jew is not necessarily of national Israel but true only by faith, the Old Testament prophecies don’t have to necessarily be fulfilled literally because they can and do apply to a spiritual people of God.  That’s why Paul could renounce every aspect of his Jewish pedigree and count it loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ (Phil 3:3-9). 

So if Paul, writing to the churches by the Holy Spirit, could spiritualise Old Testament prophecy and even what true Jewishness is, then we have warrant and precedent to regard Old Testament prophecy in the same way.  Indeed, to regard Old Testament prophecy this way is not even an option, it is the only way to understand it.  How can we insist on a literal fulfilment for national Israel in some future time when the New Testament itself shows us how these prophecies have been fulfilled already in the Church?

The apostle James: Acts 15:14-17 – The fallen house of David

The apostle James, bishop of the church in Jerusalem, and presider of the Jerusalem Council, is also one of those on my selective list of those who allegorised or spiritualised the prophecies to Israel.  In summing up the discussion at the Council of Jerusalem where the problem of law and gospel clashed, part of what he concluded was that the Church was the fulfilment of prophecy to Israel.  Here is part of what he said Simeon has related how God first looked favourably on the Gentiles, to take from among them a people for his name.  This agrees with the words of the prophets, as it is written, ‘After this I will return, and will rebuild again the dwelling of David, which has fallen; from its ruins I will rebuild it, and I will set it up, so that all other peoples may seek the Lord – even all the Gentiles over whom my name has been called.’  Thus says the Lord, who has been making these things known from long ago (Acts 15:14-17; quoted from Amos 11:9-12).

In this passage, James shows that God has gone to the Gentiles, who were not his people at first as the Jews were, and has rebuilt the dwelling of David which had fallen – the dwelling of David which was now rebuilt in Christ.  He shows how this was prophesied in the Old Testament with a seeming literal prophecy but the fulfilment was spiritual – Christ is David and the tent or dwelling is the Church: Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? (1 Cor 3:16).

The apostle Peter: 1 Peter 2:9-10 – The true holy nation

My next witness is the Apostle Peter.  He writes to the churches: “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.  Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy” (1 Pet 2:9-10).

Could anything be clearer?  Every phrase, every word he uses in this passage, are terms used for Israel, the Old Testament people of God.  Peter was a Jew and he knew exactly what he was writing.  It was no coincidence that he uses names which describe Israel when he is writing to Christians; no coincidence that he chose a prophecy given to literal Israel to apply to the Church.  He recognised that the prophecies to Israel had their fulfilment in the Church, and he wrote to encourage them with this understanding.

The apostle John: John 18:36 – Jesus’ kingdom is spiritual and not of this world

When Jesus was undergoing his trial before Pontius Pilate he told him “My kingdom is not of this world”.  It was not of this world then, and will not be of this world in the future.  Matthew Henry says of this verse “Its rise is not from this world.  Its nature is not worldly; it is a kingdom within men set up in their hearts and consciences.  Its guards and supports are not worldly; its weapons are spiritual.  Its subjects, though they are in the world, yet are not of the world”

When Jesus returns, it will not be to reign over a temporary earthly kingdom but to usher in the eternal state; which means that the so-called “Rapture” will be Jesus returning to bring in the new age of eternal life with him for the saints, and the damnation of the wicked.  In Matthew chapter 13 Jesus told some parables about the kingdom; in the parable of the wheat and the tares (13:24-30; 36-43) the end of the world is described as the harvest (13:39); the wheat i.e. the children of the kingdom (13:38) and the tares are the children of the wicked one (13:38).  Both the wheat and the tares are left to grow together until the harvest, at which time the tares will be gathered up first and cast into the fire (13:30), then the wheat will be gathered to God and “the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father” (Matt 13:43). 

In another of the parables in Matthew chapter 13 is the parable of the dragnet (13:47-50) which is essentially the same as that of the wheat and the tares; at the end of the world the angels will separate the wicked from among the just and they will be cast into hell.

Both parables describe events at the end of the world and there is no mention of a thousand-year reign of Christ over Israel from Jerusalem; no mention of a temple in which are animal sacrifices; no Rapture; no Great Tribulation as they describe it; in fact, none of the scenario hoped for by Premillennialists is here even hinted at.  Rather, we see the wicked and the righteous at the end of time gathered at the harvest and assigned to their appointed end, whether heaven or hell.

The Millennium is not a literal thousand year period

Furthermore, the Millennium is not a literal thousand years.  The reference in Revelation chapter 20 to “the thousand years” was a symbolic period signifying a long time, as are many other descriptions given in this same book.  The book of Revelation is also called The Apocalypse, which signifies a genre of writing which consists of graphically lurid images which can’t possibly be descriptions of literal figures or events; for example, the earth is totally destroyed in chapter 6, but humanity is not; then, in chapter 8, the earth is destroyed again.  This is clearly symbolic language, as can be confirmed by the same images and descriptions which prophesied the destruction of Babylon by the Medes and the Persians (Isa 13:9-22), and the conquest of Egypt and her allied nations by Babylon (Ezek ch 30).  And the writer of Hebrews distinctly says that we are living in the last days already (Heb 1:1-2).

What about the Jews today?

Can they be said to be the people of God?  There are some influential teachers who say they are.  In fact, these Christian Zionists love the Jews so much they refuse to preach the gospel to them because, as these teachers insist, the Jews don’t need the gospel; they’re already God’s people.  But the whole message of the New Testament, i.e. of Jesus and the apostles, is that the gospel has to be preached to all men for all time.  “Go therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you.  And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matt 28:19-20).

But Israel has rejected their Messiah and the gospel and they don’t even believe the Old Testament.  When they do read it, there is a veil over their eyes which has blinded them (2 Cor 3:13-14) which will only be removed in Christ – and when that happens they will NOT be restored as the OT people of God but will be part of the NEW Jerusalem in which Jews and Gentiles are one people in Christ.  They do not now speak for God or bear witness to him, and the terrible history of the Jews bears witness to God’s judgement and rejection of them. 

Martin Luther: On the Jews and their Lies

“For this year, which we Christians write as the year 1542 since the birth of Christ, is exactly 1468 years, going on fifteen hundred years, since Vespasian and Titus destroyed Jerusalem and expelled the Jews from the city…..For such ruthless wrath of God is sufficient evidence that they assuredly have erred and gone astray.  Even a child can comprehend this.  For one dare not regard God as so cruel that he would punish his own people so long, so terribly, so unmercifully, and in addition keep silent, comforting them neither with words nor with deeds, and fixing no time limit and no end to it.  Who would have faith, hope, or love toward such a God?  Therefore this work of wrath is proof that the Jews, surely rejected by God, are no longer his people, and neither is he any longer their God.  This is in accord with Hosea 1:9, ‘Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God.’  Yes, unfortunately, this is their lot, truly a terrible one.  They may interpret this as they will; we see the facts before our eyes, and these do not deceive us” (Luther, M, 2014, “On the Jews and Their Lies”, RiverCrest Publishing, Austin, Texas).

“The Scripture quotations contained herein are made from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright, 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A.  Used by permission.  All rights reserved.”